Introduction:
The UK constitution is mostly unwritten. Since the UK constitution is mostly
unwritten, the British people cant not point to a special document as their
constitution. However this does not mean that the UK constitution does not
exist. It exists in different documents and sources.
The sources
of UK constitution:
The sources of
UK constitution are, therefore many and diverse. In this respect J.H. Price
says –“A life-time’s study would not make any student and expert on all aspects
of the British Constitution, since the sources which he would have to study are
so vast and ramified.”
The sources or
components of UK Constitution may be divided into two groups namely:
(a) Legal
sources and
(b) Non-legal
sources.
The
analytical study of the fundamental legal sources of UK Constitution: The
following are the fundamental legal sources of UK Constitution-
(a) Statutes,
(b) Case
law/Common law and
(c) The Royal
Prerogatives.
Description
of above mentioned legal sources:
(a)Statutes: This
is the law created by Parliament. Acts of Parliament are approved by the
Commons, Lords and the Monarchs, gain the force of law and are then implemented
by the executive and enforce by the courts. Statute Law is the important source
of the UK Constitution as, under the doctrine of Parliamentary Sovereignty, the
UK Parliament is the supreme law making body.
The major
statutes are given bellow:
The Magna
Carta,1215:
The Magna Charta
or the Great Charter is Britain’s best-known constitutional document. In 1215
feudal barons forced he “tyrannical” King John (1199-1216) to agree to a series
of concessions embodied in a charter which became known as the Magna Charta.61-clauses
set out
a clear expression of the rights of the community against the crown. The
contents deal with the “free” Church, feudal law, towns, trade and merchants, the
reform of law and justice, the behavior of royal officials and royal forests. Since
that day the Magna Charta has become part of English Law and established the
important principle that the King is not above the law. Original copies of the
charter exist in Salisbury Cathedral, Lincoln castle and the British Museum in
London.
Analytically we
can say
The Magna Charta nowadays principally of historical interest, represents
an early settlement between the Crown and the barons, limiting the power of the
Crown and providing for the right to trial by jury.
The petition
of Right,1689
The petition of
right arose as a result of Darnel’s Case(1628),where the defendants had been
convicted and imprisoned for refusing to pay a loan imposed by king Charles I. The
petition forbade such loans, taxes and other monetary demands without the
consent of the parliament.
The Bill of
Rights, 1689
The Bill of
Rights was the culmination of long-running disputes between the Crown and
parliament and represents the foundation of the contemporary constitution,
limiting the powers of the Crown and ensuring the supremacy of parliament over
the Crown. The Bill declared the power of suspending or executing Laws by the
Crown without parliamentary consent to be illegal. It also declares the levying
of money for use of the Crown under the prerogative without parliamentary consent
to be illegal.
The Act of
settlement, 1700
The Act of
settlement clarified the line of succession to the throne. The Act also
provided for security of tenure for the judiciary, thus ending the power of the
Crown to dismiss judges at will. In relation to succession to throne, the Act
tied the succession to protestant heirs, thus prohibiting accession to the
throne by persons who are Roman Catholics, or who marry Roman Catholics.
Acts of Union
with Scotland 1706, Ireland 1700
This treaties
brought about the Union with Ireland and Scotland. While the Act of Union with
Scotland remains in force, and its continuing importance stressed in the debate
on devolution to the Scottish parliament under the Scotland Act 1998, the Act
of Union with Ireland met its demise. The Treaty of union with Scotland, for
example, provided that the two kingdoms of England and Scotland shall be united
in one kingdom by the name of Great Britain.
The
Parliament Acts 1911 and 1949
The parliament
Acts of 1911 and 1949 regulate the relation between the House of Commons and
House of Lords and ensure that while the unelected House of Lords may delay legislation
introduced in the commons, ultimately it must give way to elected House.
The European
Communities Act 1972
The European
communities Act as amended, together with the treaties on European Union 1992,
1997 and 2000, regulate the United Kingdom’s membership with the European Union
and continue to have immense significance for the constitution of the United
Kingdom. The Law of the European Union and Community represents an increasingly
significant source of constitutional Law.
The Human
Rights Act 1998
The Human Rights
Act 1998 incorporates the rights enshrined in the European Convention on Human
Rights and Freedom into domestic Law represents fundamental changes in the
domestic protection of rights. The Act provides citizens for first time with a
code of rights which are enforceable in the domestic Courts rather than in the
European Courts of human rights.
The House of
Lords Act 1999
The Act
represents the first stage of the reform program of the House of Lords, and
removes the majority of hereditary peers from that House.
Other
Statutes:-
- Statutes of West Minister 1931.
- His Majesty’s Declaration of Abdication Act 1936.
- The Regency Act 1937.
- Royal Title’s Act 1953.
(b) Case law/Common law:
Parts of British
Constitutional Law have not been enacted by the parliament but are simply based
of ancient custom which have subsequently either been enforced by Courts or
recognized by the Statutes of the parliament. For instants, fundamental
freedoms in England are essentially Common Law right and these rights have been
further guaranteed by statute, the Habeas Corpus Act 1679. The important of
this Common Law Principles is two fold. Their emphasis on the rights of the
individual has contributed to the essential philosophy of our constitution,
their application by the judges from the reign of Henry II determined the
development of the constitution, for it established supremacy of Law and prevented
any extension of the King’s power.
(c) Royal
Prerogatives:
The term “prerogatives”
derives from the Latin words “Prae” which means pre and “Rogo” which means to
ask for or to question. Etymologically prerogatives are the rights to ask for
or to question.
This refers to
discretionary power of the Crown that are employed by government ministers in
the name of the Monarch. The Crown retains a number of powers that date back to
before Britain became a constitutional monarchy in the century 17th.
These include the power to declare war, to dissolve parliament, to appoint
government ministers and judges. Today this powers lie with the prime minister
and govt. ministers, the prime ministers will inform the Monarch of their
decision but the Monarch has not real power to veto their chosen course. The
prerogatives power of the Crown are those powers which are to residue of the
arbitrary and discretionary powers legally left in the hands of the Crown
which, being exercised by the govt. in the name of the Crown entails every Act
whish the executive govt. can do without the authority of the parliament.
Conclusion:
The UK Constitution is mostly unwritten. It is
based on not only legal sources but also many of non-legal sources.
Books Reference:
(1) Constitutional Law of UK and USA - by
Md. Rezaul Karim
(2) The Modern British Constitution:
Theory and Practice – by Abdul Halim
(3) Select Constitutions-by Anup
Chand Kapur and K.K. Misra
No comments:
Post a Comment