In modern int. law, not only state but International Organisation also is included as one of the subjects of international law.
Government
works as the representative of its citizens whereas an int. org.
composed of sovereign, states voluntarily join for common pursuit of
certain goals. In national state, various branches of government,
together with their powers, are laid down in a constitution; provisions
are binding upon the individual citizens. An international organisation,
on the other hand, rests upon its concerned constitutions, which are
much less, secure. The functions of modern states and the rights,
duties, and powers of their instrumentalities are governed by their
respective constitutional laws. Similarly, I/Os are regulated by a body
of rules embodied in their respective documents that may well be
described as international constitution law. The customary separation of
powers on a national level into executive, legislative, and judicial
branches is roughly approximated in an international organisation. The
constitutional structure of the International Organisations does not
follow precisely the same pattern as in the constitutions of modern
states but there are significant analogies between them.
Constitutionally, functions of states are split up into three-folds -
executive, legislative and judiciary. Let us see how far these three
branches of both the constitutions are resembled or differed.
Executive:
It
is true that there is no central executive organ with the same degree
of authority over the international community as any government
exercises over a modern state. In fact, there is no executive organ in
international organisation, athough certain organs are assigned special
duties and are permitted to act in specific situations. In
administration, the permanent secretariat of an I/O has an extremely
important function. The Secretary-General is the executive head of the
secretariat and can speak for the organisation.
Legislative
International
Organisations does not possess legislative body in the ordinary sense.
Ordinarily, the organisation meets in regular annual session with an
equal representation from all members. The annual conference is
essentially a policy-making body, performing in addition to various
financial and supervisory duties. It carries out certain constituent
functions.
Judicial:
The
differences between the judicial functions of national and
international tribunals are even more apparent. The ICJ functions as the
judicial organ of the UN, but substantially, it differs with the
national courts in many ways. The Court can neither exercise its
jurisdictions, nor execute its decisions likewise the national courts.
Above all, filing of suits in the international court does not happen
precisely like filing cases before the national courts. There are
complicated procedures.
No comments:
Post a Comment